![]() ![]() The bills carved out an exception for a candidate’s childcare costs "that are incurred as a direct result of campaign activity." Instead of voting on the legislation, the Senate agreed to form a panel with the House to work out concerns.Įxamples of personal use, according to the bills, are mortgages and rents, automobile costs, vacations and country club memberships. This time, the measure was passed by that chamber’s Privileges and Elections Committee but faced roadblocks on the Senate floor, where some members said the bill needed more specificity. In 2021, the House, then controlled by Democrats, again unanimously approved a ban in a block with other uncontested bills and sent it to the Senate. The measures, however, were killed in Senate committees, where there was concern that there can be a thin line between personal and campaign expenses and a prohibition could entrap well-intentioned candidates. Both years, they were bundled in a block with other uncontested bills and unanimously passed without debate by the 100-member House. In 20, the bills swept through a subcommittee and committee of the Republican-controlled House without dissent. From 2018 to 2021, O’Quinn cast six votes for bills that would have banned personal use of campaign money. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |